Monday and Tuesday this week (16 and 17 October 06), I went on a two day Industrial PhD course offered by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Denmark. The course was module 1 of 3, and the focus of this module was mainly on communicating science and networking.
Communicating science dealt with how to write (or talk) about our research projects to newspapers or just the general public - this is actually rather hard. They wanted us to describe the benefits of our projects for the non-scientists, also to help us when communicating within our company. The skills of the consultants teaching us the communication part could definitely be discussed. However, I believe that they had some very good points which are definitely of use to me when trying to describe my project in just a few words:
• Focus on the value of my PhD project (in business terms)
• Prepare an "elevator speech" explaining my project (and the value of it)
The networking part discussed the value of making ourselves understandable (by use of the above points) and accessible. This would give us a network to draw on when we e.i. encounter theoretical and/or empirical challenges or when just being generally suck. In my opinion, the best networking that took place on the course was during our breaks and meals when chatting with all the other industrial PhD students doing research in very different areas - from ice creams over cancer to strategy. The reason is that even though our research areas might be totally different, we all face some of the same challenges.
We also had a session on project management, and we were presented to a model that categorized our projects based on whether our goal and how to get there (solution) were clearly defined. I believe that neither my goal nor my solution are clearly defined which label my PhD project as "ePM" (Extreme Project Management) and the recommendation is : "Make an educated guess and get started" using an iterative approach - and this is also what I am trying to do... I believe. However, it can be a bit frustrating at times so if anyone has some recommendations on this part, please let me know :-)
All together, it was an inspiring course with some useful recommendations - even though some of the teachers definitely need to rethink who the audience is at such a course - and I look forward to module 2 in February not least to get the opportunity to meet my fellow Industrial PhD students again.