How Architecture Communicates the Broader Cultural Context: 4 Studio Libeskind Projects

0

How Architecture Communicates the Broader Cultural Context: 4 Studio Libeskind Projects

Polish-American architect, artist, teacher and scenographer, Daniel Libeskind, founder of Studio Libeskind in 1989, believes that buildings are designed with perceptible human energy, constructed with the intention of responding to the larger cultural context in which they are constructed. His commitment to expanding the field of architecture reflects his deep interest and involvement in philosophy, art, literature and music.

It addresses the notion of drawings akin to a sheet music, a piece of music performed by a like-minded community. Proportion, light and materiality are all involved in the design, and in the same way buildings are also called upon to present space, atmosphere and illuminate the practice.

Jewish Museum, Berlin.  Image © Denis EsakovMO Modern Art Museum, Vilnius.  Photo © Hufton + CrowJewish Museum, Berlin.  Image © Denis Esakov18.36.54 House, Connecticut.  Image courtesy of Nikolas Koenig+ 28

Libeskind believes that drawing is the source of architecture, the hand, the eye and the mind being interconnected and sharing a process that is not inherently intellectual, but a kind of spiritual desire. He goes on to note that a building is not the repetition of another building, nor constructed from a formula, however, each building is constructed to communicate the needs of a certain moment. In what follows, we will discuss some of Studio Libeskind’s projects and how they have successfully conveyed the communication ideas of the broader cultural context of specific architectural enterprises.


Related article

“I lean towards forms that lead to a point and try to make a point”: In conversation with Daniel Libeskind


18.36.54 House, Connecticut is a house designed for artists, intended to be a work of art in itself without the need to use actual works of art and sculptures in the dwelling, because the space itself must convey artistic inspiration and produce intense sensations. The 2,000 square foot house with an 18-plane, 36-point, and 54-line folding ribbon structure is made of reflective copper panels, continuing the natural material palette as it is visibly independent of its surroundings. The house intends to shift your vision through the interior of pure wood to the exterior of stainless steel, reflecting the sky and landscape in which it is surrounded, using a faceted structure to frame the views. dynamic from all angles of the site. The building is, as Libeskind says, “as spiritual as a musical composition”.

18.36.54 House, Connecticut.  Image courtesy of Nikolas Koenig
18.36.54 House, Connecticut. Image courtesy of Nikolas Koenig
18.36.54 House, Connecticut.  Image courtesy of Nikolas Koenig
18.36.54 House, Connecticut. Image courtesy of Nikolas Koenig

In 1988 Libeskind was chosen as the laureate among several other internationally renowned architects at the request of the Berlin government to expand Berlin’s original Jewish Museum, which opened in 1933 with the aim of re-establishing a Jewish presence. in Berlin after WWII. Libeskind’s design was the only project to implement radical, formal design as a tool for conceptual expression to represent the Jewish way of life, before, during and after the Holocaust. It wasn’t until 2001 that Libeskind’s addition to the museum opened, establishing a culturally and socially rooted Jewish presence in Berlin.

For Libeskind, the expansion of the museum was much more than a commission, but about forming and securing an identity in Berlin that was lost during World War II. He intended to express the feelings of absence, emptiness and invisibility, which are all expressions of the disappearance of Jewish culture. It was the use of architecture as a medium for storytelling and emotion that allowed visitors to experience the effects of the Holocaust on the city and culture of Berlin.

Jewish Museum, Berlin.  Image © Denis Esakov
Jewish Museum, Berlin. Image © Denis Esakov
Jewish Museum, Berlin.  Image © Denis Esakov
Jewish Museum, Berlin. Image © Denis Esakov

The concept of the Grand Canal Theater Dublin was to build a powerful cultural presence expressed in dynamic volumes sculpted to project a fluid and transparent public dialogue with the cultural, commercial and residential environment. The composition of the project creates a dynamic urban gathering place and an icon, reflecting the iconic joy and drama of Dublin itself, presenting itself as a landmark that emphasizes the urban context in which it was built. , in particular Grand Canal Square, the new urban square on the waterfront of the Grand Canal port.

Libeskind planned the architectural concept of the theater to be based on different stages of construction, as well as representing the main facade of a large public square. The plaza acts as a grand outdoor concourse for the theatre, itself becoming a stage for civic gathering with the dramatic elevation of the theater in the backdrop providing viewing platforms, with the roof terrace providing stunning views on the Haven.

Grand Canal Theatre, Dublin.  Image © Ros Kavanagh
Grand Canal Theatre, Dublin. Image © Ros Kavanagh
Grand Canal Theatre, Dublin.  Image © Ros Kavanagh
Grand Canal Theatre, Dublin. Image © Ros Kavanagh

The MO Museum of Modern Art has been recognized as “a cultural milestone for the city of Vilnius and Lithuania as a whole”. Its aim was to showcase local art, as well as explore its connections to the global art scene. Conceived as the cultural gateway linking the 18th century to the medieval walled city, the concept of the building is inspired by the historic city gates, with references to local architecture in both form and materials. Libeskind notes that “it was exciting to design an intimate and iconic museum for a large collection of contemporary art”.

The building and its architecture recall the history and beauty of Vilnius, serving as a wonderful place to enjoy the art and spirit the city has to offer. In addition, the rectilinear facade is clad in luminous white plaster that references the city’s local materials, emphasizing the inclusion of public space as one of the most important that the Studio integrates into its designs. for the benefit of external cultural institutions. The museum’s founder and collector, Viktoras Butkus, goes on to say that Libeskind’s work is both “iconic and democratic”, and that it was important for the museum to actively express openness and reflect the ethos of collecting. , as well as the institution. These generous public spaces throughout the design play a vital role in communicating these ideas.

MO Modern Art Museum, Vilnius.  Photo © Hufton + Crow
MO Modern Art Museum, Vilnius. Photo © Hufton + Crow
MO Modern Art Museum, Vilnius.  Photo © Hufton + Crow
MO Modern Art Museum, Vilnius. Photo © Hufton + Crow



Source link

Share.

Comments are closed.